has found the situation ordinary. Dispute the transfer to another kinder-garden children faced abuses. They were bitten, bite by another
children [*3]. The kinder-garden administration refused to protect them.
Demander was mocked by the employers [*4] and bitten by his colleagues because he is not a true Jew.
P.2. His wife has difficulties in finding a job [*5] , and when she was at least hired she was insulted, bitten and - under certain circumstances
- became a victim of a sexual harassment[*6].
There were multiple insults and abuses from theirs neighbors, who were furious because demanders in their eyes are not true Jews.
They turned to police in innumerous occasions with no results. One time police itself abused and ill-treated the demander under certain
circumstances. His lawyer told him that nothing could be done against police.
They contacted innumerous organizations including Amnesty International. They wrote to members of parliament and contacted a number
of lawyers with no result [*7]. The demander also said that he was persecuted because of denouncing fascism [7-a].
Demander's mother also became a victim of multiple aggressions. She was attacked by a group of youngsters when she went to pick up
the children from school [*8]. Policemen at the police station refused to pay an attention to that incident.
In Nov. 1993 she was attacked by her neighbor; she stroke her by a basket with oranges and cried to her "goy!". It tool place at a market.
In January 1994 in company with her children she went to pick them up from school, when she was attacked by a group of youngsters, who
thrown stones at her and injured her [*9].
One evening in 1994 [*10] youngsters, friends of their neighbor, have thrown a little box at her door [*11]. She composed a letter to police in
that case but police never responded [*12].
P.3. Paragraphs 1-2. In context of that the demander together with his family including his mother came to ask a refugee status in Canada
[*13].
Paragraph 3. After seeing that declaration, studying their lawyer's arguments and other material we came to a conclusion that demanders
are not refugees. We came to that conclusion because of the next reasons:
Paragraphs 4-6. Demanders claim that they flied Israel for seeking an asylum and because of a number of incidents, which victims they
became. But the tribunal is disagree with that because [...] they all came to Israel according to Israeli authorities permission and acceptation,
and also because they took an advantage from benefits of a free transportation to Israel, Israeli citizenship, a certain amount of money for
settlement, a free language course, and other benefits. They also might use other help because we have the documentation indicated that
the population in Israel gives material help to newcomers.
P.4. Paragraphs 2-5. It is possible that during their life in Israel they faced some difficulties because some individual ultra-religious feel that
their rights are violated because of the presence of 2 secular adults who refuse to practice their religion. But there are no evidences that
Russians are persecuted because of their religion, nationality, or because they are mixed couples or because they express anti fascist
views as pretend the demander.
In result we were convinced that the demanders are [dangerous for their state] exaggerators who painted a picture of their state as a state
of slavery, injustice, where Russians are bitten if they do not work quickly enough, where Russian children are victims of mockery
committing by theirs classmates and teachers, and where Russian women are victims of sexual harassment. And that all is going on
without any possibility to obtain a protection from the state.
As a result of that the demanders turned to police in several occasions without success, to innumerous organizations, human rights groups
and to Amnesty International, composed letters to members of parliament and contacted more then one lawyer without getting any
protection from the state.
It is incongruous to that documentation about Israel, which we have chosen. This documentation present Israel as a democratic society,
maintaining a justified juridical system in favor of the citizen. Police never have any discriminatory behavior towards Russian or Arabs.
P..5. Paragraphs 1-5. Multiple human right organizations are also presented in Israel, both local and international.
Documentation, which we present, we consider as completely reliable, when the demanders' documentation we consider as unbelievable.
The tribunal ignored demanders' medical and other certificates and documents because we have found that their documents show nothing
in particular.
COMMENTS 1. Children age is given incorrectly. Probably, because our children were younger, and that could give us more sympathy. 2. It
is false. Our children were abused during the celebration as well as in cause of that celebration (they were not allowed to a "suka" and were
kept in a dark room - because they are "Russians"). It is clear from our declaration. 3. It is false. They presented the event as if our children
were abused not by the teacher but by the children during the celebration, when in reality it is the teacher who abused them. 4. They
combine two different event into one what is juridicaly incorrect. 5. Without a notice that my wife could not find a job because she was
considered as Russian that sentence is incorrect. 6. It is false. She was not sexually abused. But she was beaten because she refused to