Document 19
An order from January 11 2000 to my wife, Alla, to undergo the medical examination. Only my
wife's name mentioned in this letter. This letter is a proof that refusing to include all family
members Immigration stalling the completion of our file almost one year now.
Document 20
An order from October 26 2000 to me and my daughter Marta to undergo medical
examination. Was submitted in contradiction with the previous Immigration's assurance that
only my wife has to undergo medical examination.
Document 21-a
X-ray result from Le Centre Radiologique Clarke from November 14 2000, which tremendously
contradict the Immigration's x-ray from November 01 2000 evaluation. In response to TB
double-check request (see Document 21-b) it said "NIL ACTIVE". The film was evaluated by 3
medical doctors, which came to the same "nil active" conclusion. I was seen and evaluated by
2 medical doctors since October 29, who found the TB suspicion ridiculous.
Document 22
X-ray result from November 22 1994 from the Centre Hospitalier Reddy Memorial. On request
of W. Brzezinska, M.D. if there is recent pulmonary infiltrate it said "no recent pulmonary
infiltrate shown".
Document 23
Mr. Z. JAST's certificate for Immigration in relation to the x-ray dispute.
Document 24
Internet-links to two publications, which might accelerate persecutions.
Document 25-a,b
IMS final decision in my mother's case from Dec. 5 2000.
Document 26
Document 27
List of "civil" events. Relates to our will to contribute to the society.
Lev GUNIN December 2 2000 Montreal
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER ONE
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) November 30 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
This is the complaint on actions and decisions, which my advisers and I found inadmissible, like
attempts to cause damage to my mother's and my heath. Theoretically falsification and blatant
manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which one do not
have (it could be lethal).
.
I submit you 5 documents. The First is this one. Second is a complaint against refusal to allow
all my family members medical examinations half a year ago. Third is my disagreement with the
decision of Immigration Health Services from November 23, 2000. Fourth is a shortened
description of events, which manifested abuse of power, ungrounded secrecy, misconduct and
criminal manipulation of medical data. Fifth is a copy of a complaint made to Montreal Chest
Institute. Sixth is a wider description of events, with more astonishing and outraged details.
However, because of the length of the Sixth document its submission by fax could be found
offensive, so, please, tell me where to send it by post or e-mail.
I would like to know:
A) Who made all mentioned in six documents unjust decisions (names, position, what their role
in my file).
B) On what ground (law, paragraph, circumstances).