January 2000 - Certificat de
selectione du Quebec was issued for
my mother.
January 2000, a ruling from IMS
ordering my mother additional tests:
strum creatinine (blood test) and
echocardiogram.
June 30, 2000 - IMS ridiculous
demand of a resume from "the last
visit to cardiologist".
July 27 2000
- rapport of Dr. Gordon Creenstein
(anatomy, not pathology) was
submitted to Immigration.
September 2000
another letter from IMS ordering
another urine test and then a visit to
an urologist.
September 19 2000
offensive letter from Immigration
officer. December 2000
IMS final negative decision confirming
the illegal prejudicial decision from
Nov. 99.
- DOCUMENT NUMBER TWO
To Immigration's Canada Complaint Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237)
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
A COPY OF DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO IMMIGRATION
ON MAY 15 2000
By this letter we ask Immigration's agent assigned to my file to make a special ruling to order medical examinations for all members
of our family, not only for Alla GUNIN, my wife. As we know from our legal advisers, this procedure is required for all family members
for the landed immigrant's status. If you insist that only my wife has to do the medical examination, please, send us a written warrant.
We have a well-grounded suspicion that somebody might use the delay in ordering the medical examination for all members of our
family for artificial sabotage of issuing us the landed immigrant's status. We will appreciate your cooperation.
YOURS TRULY
Lev GUNIN
in name of family GUNIN
The 15 of May 2000
COPY - DOCUMENT NUMBER THREE
To Immigration's Complaints Board
(faxes: (780) 632-8101 (514) 283-8237) December 1 2000
From Lev GUNIN (514-499-1294)
I disagree with the Immigration Medical Services decision "ev 7001-850497Z" (with date mentioned: November 23, 2000) from
Ottawa, received by me on November 29, 2000 (anonymous - no name or signature). The goal of this ruling is not to establish the
medical truth but to put a hardship on my family (and me).
My arguments.
(See the decision's text - as it was red to me by dr. Giannakis - in Document N4: on the bottom)
1. The decision ruled that Mr. Giannakis's respond should be submitted before November 30, 2000. Why then the letter arrived only