11903.fb2
"racists." But why stop there - why not follow up the two left jabs with the
right-hand haymaker, "anti-Semites"? The answer perhaps is that it may appear
more credible to smear all critics of the film with the same brush, and the
accusation of anti-Semitism does not stick to those critics who happen to be
Jewish. The deployment of terms suggestive of psychological disorder, such as
"revisionist," "racist," or "anti-Semite" exemplifies the stock Jewish ploy of
attempting to silence opposition by dispensing psychiatric diagnoses.
Creating collaborators in disinformation. Jews who lie not only discredit Jews
generally, but also discredit any whom they lure into sharing their lies.
Thus, had the 761st Tank Battalion been seduced into accepting whatever
momentary glory attaches to wrongly claiming to have liberated Buchenwald, then
the 761st would have ultimately suffered a loss of credibility. The 761st does
have genuine achievements, and foresaw only discredit in fabricating any. In
the words of Philip Latimer, president of the 761st veterans' organization,
"The unit has a lot to be proud of ... and I don't want to see it blamed for
this documentary. I don't want the unit to be hurt."
Attempts have been made to seduce Ukrainians, and others, into a similar
complicity in Jewish disinformation, and in the case of Ukrainians, these
attempts have been largely successful. The Ukrainians' reward has been to
receive a Righteous Gentile Award for their efforts in saving Jews during the
Second World War. In accepting such an award, however, such Ukrainians
implicitly acquiesce and lend support to a Jewish history of the war, which is
crammed with disinformation, much of it harmful to Ukrainian interests. Among
the items of disinformation in this false history is that Ukrainians were eager
collaborators of the Nazis (when in reality Ukrainians overwhelmingly served as
opponents), that Ukrainian efforts to save Jews were rare (when in reality
large numbers of Ukrainians took grave risks and even gave their lives to save
Jews), that any anti-Jewish feeling on the part of Ukrainians that did exist
was gratuitous and pathological (when in reality it was founded on a memory of
the recent Jewish domination of the destruction of Ukraine under Communism).
Thus, any Ukrainians who were offered a Righteous Gentile Award should have
declined it for the same reason that the 761st declined to be honored in the
Liberators. Any Ukrainians who have accepted such an award should renounce it.
Ukrainians should consider withdrawing their support from the Public Broadcasting
Service (PBS). The PBS is portrayed by Goldberg as supportive of the
Liberators even after the film had been discredited. Ukrainians may recall,
furthermore, that the PBS broadcast a severely flawed anti-Demjanjuk
documentary despite prior notice on the part of Ukrainian representatives
specifying the nature of these flaws. Observations such as these invite the
conclusion that the PBS acts in sympathy with Jewish disinformation, and in
opposition to Ukrainian interests. For this reason, Ukrainians should consider
withdrawing their support from the PBS.
Ukrainians should consider cancelling their subscriptions to TIME magazine. The
Apollo Theater showing of the Liberators was sponsored by "Time Warner and a
host of rich and influential New Yorkers." Readers of the Ukrainian Archive
will be reminded that TIME magazine was responsible for the calumniation of
Ukraine in the Wallowing Photograph incident. From these two indications, we
may wonder whether Time Warner, and TIME magazine, are not sympathetic toward
Holocaust disinformation and hostile toward Ukrainian interests. After having