(7) The Holocaust story has been adulterated. The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes should
disclose that the history of the Holocaust has been adulterated by the admixture of
fantasies concocted by unprincipled opportunists - Jerzy Kosinski being the most widely
known example, and the Wiesenthal-Safer calumny providing the instance closest to home.
(8) CBS stone-walled. The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes should disclose that 60 Minutes
illegally destroyed the 16,000 pieces of mail which protested The Ugly Face of Freedom,
and that 60 Minutes also delayed for five years (and maybe a little bit longer) before
informing its viewers of the defects in the original broadcast.
(9) Mistranslation. Conceding for present purposes that 60 Minutes was not clearly in
the wrong to always translate Zhyd as Kike, nevertheless The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes
should disclose that when the editor of Za Vilnu Ukrainu used the word Yevrei, 60
Minutes was obligated to translate that as Jew, and was clearly in the wrong to have
translated it as Kike.
(10) Ukrainian sacrifices to save Jews. The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes should tear up
its picture of unrelieved Ukrainian hostility to Jews by disclosing that a large number
of Ukrainians risked their lives, and gave their lives, to save Jews, and that no
comparable reciprocity has ever been observed from the Jewish side. The case of
Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky hiding large numbers of Jews on church property could be
featured in this context, as could the Ukrainian Bodnar's saving the life of Simon
Wiesenthal.
(11) The chief Ukrainian roles during WW II were those of victim and of victor.
The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes should tear up its picture of unrelieved Ukrainian sympathy
for Nazism by disclosing that Ukrainians were among the foremost victims of the Nazis,
suffering losses much greater than Jewish losses, and were in the forefront of the
battle which defeated the Nazis.
Why did they do it?
Jews have motives for calumniating Ukraine. The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes should
finally inform its viewers of Jewish motives for calumniating Ukrainians and Ukraine,
among these being the following:
(1) Brain drain. Magnified and incited Ukrainian anti-Semitism is needed in order to
increase the brain drain from Ukraine to Israel.
(2) Image of the Jew as victim. Inculcating the image of Jews as victims of the
Nazis, and Ukrainians as the leading collaborators of the Nazis, serves to crowd out,
and give the appearance of implausibility to, a series of other images: that Ukrainians
were leading victims of the Nazis, that Ukrainians played a leading role in the defeat
of the Nazis, that Jews collaborated with the Nazis more than Ukrainians did, that
Ukrainians risked their lives and gave their lives to save Jews, and that in today's
world, among the leading perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity are the
Israelis.
(3) The Lviv massacre. Promoting the false story of Ukrainians massacring Jews prior
to the arrival of the Germans is particularly useful in winning disbelief of the true
story that the Jewish-dominated NKVD massacred Ukrainians prior to the arrival of the
Germans.
(4) Bohdan Khmelnytsky. The Jewish calumniation of Ukrainians strengthens a frame
of mind that will more readily accept the Jewish revision of the Bohdan Khmelnytsky
uprising of 1648 from the accurate view that it was a rebellion against severe
Polish-Jewish oppression to the false view that it was a spontaneous outburst of
gratuitous and genocidal anti-Semitism.
(5) US aid. The Jewish calumniation of Ukrainians weakens competition for US aid, as by