refugee status for six months following removal. Prior to the six months, previously
refused claimants would continue to have the option of seeking protection at any
Canadian mission abroad. Persons who return to Canada after six months may
apply for a pre-removal risk assessment but they are not able to re-access the
refugee protection system of the IRB.
Criminals will be barred from the Refugee Protection System
The new Legislation clarifies inadmissibility criteria to ensure that serious
criminals, terrorists, human rights violators and security risks will be barred from
access to the refugee determination system and promptly removed from Canada.
Campaign Against Fraudulent Medical Research
P.O. Box 234
Lawson, New South Wales 2783
Australia
Phone: +61 (0)2-4758-6822
URL: www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr
Although the above materials are highly recommended by CAFMR, we do not necessarily share all the views expressed by the authors.
Note about copyright: Any of the above information may be downloaded, copied, printed or otherwise distributed without seeking permission from CAFMR. However, printed acknowledgement is required when this is done.
Bradley R. Smith
Revisionism by: CODOH, POB 439016, San Diego, CA 92143
The Revisionist Campus Project
David Irving's Reply to
Jeffrey Shallit's "Lies of Our
Times"
London,
[ ]
Dear Professor Shallit,
I am not a subscriber to the Internet, but over the last few
months I have heard repeatedly about scurrilous materials
which you have been posting on that medium; at least you
have had the courage to put your name to them as author,
although this lays you open to the kind of lawsuit which I have
started conducting--and winning--here in the British courts.
I have so far seen versions of your Shallit's Report, and of your
"Lies of Our Times." You appear to be interested in the Truth,
and that being so I am making these comments to assist you
in the search for that elusive quantitй.
It appears that your primary source is a handout or handouts
of the Wiener Library (Dr David Cesarini) and of the Board of
Deputies of British Jews, who have furnished the League of
Human Rights of the B'nai Brith Canada with two lengthy
secret reports which are the subject of dispute between me
and the Board under both the Data Protection Act 1984 (the
Board at first denied having any data on me), and the
Defamation Act 1952 (the Board's solicitor is negotiating with
me for permission to withdraw the reports in toto, in return for
an undertaking by me not to pursue the matter in the courts).
First, your "article" Lies of Our Times (forgive the quotation
marks, but as you call me an "historian" it seems justified).
David Irving