63019.fb2 A Critical Cinema 2: Interviews with Independent Filmmakers - читать онлайн бесплатно полную версию книги . Страница 395

A Critical Cinema 2: Interviews with Independent Filmmakers - читать онлайн бесплатно полную версию книги . Страница 395

Page 388

metaphysics seem very different from yours. In fact, ideas seem to have been eliminated in

Chronos

. What's left is everything

but

ideas or politics.

Reggio:

It's a triumph of technique, lavishly shot, but perhaps with

out

the presence of an Entity. It ended up as beautiful pictures, as a technical tour de force.

MacDonald:

In

Koyaanisqatsi

you use time lapse more extensively than anyone I know of.

Reggio:

Certainly we didn't pioneer time lapsing; it's been around practically as long as the camera's been around, but it's remained basically a technique for emphasis. By using it as a main drive language, I think

Koyaanisqatsi

picked up on something new. But since

Koyaanisqatsi,

it's inundated the media.

MacDonald:

You've built your approach from the ground up, without extensive experience with other films. Not surprisingly, your films recall the beginnings of cinema, in two ways. One has to do with Muybridge and his idea of motion study: time lapse allows you to do "motion studies" of one kind and slow motion, which is the central device of

Powaqqatsi,

of another kind. Second, your interest in

Powaqqatsi

in going around the world and recording footage of people and places that for a standard audience would be exotic or unusual is reminiscent of early Lumière programs.

Reggio:

Well, I think we're only at the beginning of the potential of the image. I think as we transit even more fully into the language of image, we're going to see more and more exploration of the potential of these tools for doing more than telling a story. Since I didn't want to use dialogue, I had to look at the camera as the paintbrush. In the case of

Koyaanisqatsi,

we were looking at a very accelerated world, a world of density, of critical mass, and I felt that the technique of time lapse would be extremely important in articulating an experience of the subject. In the case of

Powaqqatsi,

we're looking at a world that is intrinsically slow, that lives with the rhythms of nature, that is diversified, that is the opposite of the high kinetic energy of the industrial world. In

Powaqqatsi,

the intention was to create a mosaic, a monument, a frozen moment of the simultaneity of life as it existed in one instant around the Southern Hemisphere. We used slow motion, or very fast shooting, as the norm, and long lenses, not to romanticize the subject, but to monumentalize it so that we could look at it from a different point of view. In both

Koyaanisqatsi

and

Powaqqatsi,

the intention was to see the ordinary from an extraordinary perspective. In the case of

Powaqqatsi,

we went out with a sense of style and form that motivated the kinds of equipment we got, the kinds of lenses that we took with us.

I think a lot of people were expecting

Powaqqatsi

to be a

Koyaanisqatsi 2

. I'm very pleased that the films do not repeat each other. Both