65809.fb2 Гражданская война, террор и бандитизм (Систематизация социологии и социальная динамика) - читать онлайн бесплатно полную версию книги . Страница 17

Гражданская война, террор и бандитизм (Систематизация социологии и социальная динамика) - читать онлайн бесплатно полную версию книги . Страница 17

неподвластен партии, а значит, должен быть по

возможности уничтожен. Еще важнее то, что

половой голод вызывает истерию, а она

желательна, ибо е° можно преобразовать в

военное неистовство и поклонению вождю?.

Джордж Оруэлл. ?1984?

Чтобы дать читателю возможность ознакомиться с современным взглядом на террор я приведу здесь статью о терроризме из американской энциклопедии.

Copyright - 1992 Grolier Electronic Publishing, Inc.

terrorism

Terrorism is the sustained, clandestine use of violence, including

murder, kidnapping, hijacking, and bombings, to achieve a

political purpose. Definitions in the U.S. Intelligence and

Surveillance Act of 1979 and the United Kingdom Prevention of

Terrorism Act of 1976 stress the use of violence to coerce or

intimidate the civilian population with a view to affecting

government policy. In popular usage, however, as influenced by

politicians and the media, "terrorism" is now increasingly used as

a generic term for all kinds of political violence, especially as

manifested in revolutionary and guerrilla warfare.

Nevertheless, not all political violence short of conventional war

is terrorism. Political assassination may or may not be a

terrorist act, depending on the degree of commitment to a

sustained program of terror. Assassinations of Tsar Alexander II

and other prominent figures in imperial Russia by nihilists and

social revolutionaries were part of a sustained program of

violence aimed at bringing down the Tsarist regime and as such

were terrorist acts. On the other hand, the assassinations of

Presidents Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, while undoubtedly

political in motive, were not part of a sustained program and

hence cannot properly be called terrorism. The term is

inappropriate as applied to the suicide attacks of religious

fanatics on military personnel in a war zone, as in the case of

the bombings of U.S. Marine and French Foreign Legion bunkers in

Lebanon in 1983, although not to the bombings of the U. S. Embassy

(1983-84).

The deliberate killing of civilians to intimidate the civilian

population or government is one of the worst features of

contemporary terrorism and can clearly be distinguished from the

type of clandestine warfare waged by resistance groups or

insurgency movements against official and military targets. By

their actions, the PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION (PLO) and the

Provisional Wing of the IRISH REPUBLICAN ARMY are terrorist

organizations. But one would not use the term to describe the

Polish and French underground resistance movements of World War

II. When governments engage in illegal and clandestine kidnapping

and murder to intimidate their people--as in the case of the Nazis

in Germany and the Argentine military junta in power from 1976 to

1983--the term "state terrorism" is appropriate.

One important characteristic of modern terrorism is its quest for

spectacular horror effects in order to attract media coverage.